Throughout Roman Abramovich’s 16 years as owner of Chelsea, Stamford Bridge has been home to something of a managerial carousel.
Chelsea have gone through 10 permanent managers in that time, plus a number of interim and caretaker bosses in between appointments.
We’ve ranked every Chelsea boss under Abramovich to have managed a minimum of 10 games, meaning no Steve Holland or Ray Wilkins, but Rafa Benitez and Guus Hiddink.
We’re sorry, Andre, we liked you, but someone has to be the worst, and with a 48% win rate you are objectionably the worst.
Plus, Chelsea paid a world-record €15million to snare you from Porto. It really didn’t work out, but that doesn’t mean you weren’t a very good right-hand man.
Big Phil was supposed to be a lot of fun, and for a brief period it looked like it was going to be. Deco arrived, Milan were swept aside 5-0 in pre-season and Chelsea lost only twice in the Premier League in the first half of the season.
But then the wheels started to fall off. The Blues were thrashed 3-0 by Manchester United and lost 2-0 at Anfield, and suddenly they looked like they might not make the top four, which was all it took for anyone in those Abramovich days.
As a side note, at his unveiling, Scolari was asked whether his decision to join Chelsea was financial and replied: “Yes, that is one of the reasons. I’m 59 and I don’t want to work as a coach until I’m 70. I want to retire in four or five years, so it was a financial matter but there are other things.”
He is now 70 years old… and is onto his sixth job since leaving Chelsea as manager of Palmeiras.
We have no idea how Avram Grant took Chelsea to a Champions League final. But he did.
Ranieri did a great job prior to Abramovich’s arrival but spent just one season working for the Russian and in truth always seemed like something of a stopgap until a bigger name could arrive, despite being backed with £120million’s worth of new signings in the summer of 2003.
While he was unable to win a trophy with Chelsea, his achievements in 2003-04 on closer inspection were still pretty impressive.
The Blues finished second in the Premier League to Arsenal’s Invincibles while setting club records for the fewest goals conceded and highest points tally, also knocking the Gunners out of the Champions League on their way to the semi-finals.
But the defeat to Monaco at that stage highlighted Ranieri’s weaknesses, and David Platt’s analysis seemed a fair summation of the Italian: “Building a team that can win the title and actually steering this team to the title are two different matters entirely.”
Tarnished by being generally loathed by Chelsea fans, Benitez still deserves plenty of credit for winning the Europa League and managing to get Fernando Torres to score some goals.
A steady hand on the tiller Abramovich turned to twice to stabilise Chelsea.
After things went south under Scolari, Hiddink took over and led the Blues to 11 wins out of their remaining 13 Premier League fixtures while also lifting the FA Cup.
Were it not for some dodgy refereeing against Barcelona, Chelsea would have also made the Champions League final.
Let’s not mention his second spell after he inherited a squad left depressed by Jose Mourinho and signed Alexandre Pato.
He won the Champions League. He actually won the Champions League. F*cking hell.
Context is key with Sarri, who took over a Chelsea squad which became disaffected under Antonio Conte with less than a month until the start of the Premier League season and a remit to change the playing philosophy of the club – all while there is uncertainty surrounding the Blues’ hierarchy.
Amid a backdrop of public anger and abuse from the terraces, he has guided Chelsea back into the top four, lost the League Cup final on penalties to Pep Guardiola’s robots and thrashed Arsenal in the final of the Europa League.
It could be the start of something interesting. It will probably be the end of a short-lived experiment.
Maurizio Sarri. Wins the Europa League. Chelsea finish third behind two outstanding teams in Manchester City & Liverpool. Loses another domestic final on penalties. Plenty of us (including me) have criticised him but he can rightly hit back by saying he's fulfilled his remit.
— Phil McNulty (@philmcnulty) May 29, 2019
Conte almost single-handedly brought the back three into vogue in England while Chelsea romped to the title in his first season.
Admittedly, things went awry the following year, but he still went out on the high of upsetting Manchester United in the FA Cup final.
Plus, he seems like quite a likeable nutcase.
Couldn’t this have lasted a bit longer?
Chelsea played some of the most exciting football the Premier League had seen while winning their first league and cup double in Ancelotti’s first season, setting competition records for most goals scored, most home goals and best goal difference.
Like his compatriot Conte, he failed to replicate that success in his second campaign and ultimately paid the price.
Even taking into account how it ended (twice), it just had to be, didn’t it?